Software

How about Ethical Software?

By
Steve Hazelton
July 1, 2024
5 min read

There has been, and should be, a lot of talk about Ethical AI. Over the last several weeks, I have been revising Sturdy’s Ethical AI policy. I am trying to convey that we don’t do shady stuff and won’t let our customers do it, either.

(If you are interested in Ethical AI, we have a webinar coming up at the end of the month; the registration link is in the comments)

Writing the policy, I realized we need to talk about ethics writ large, not just as it relates to AI.

Consider the case of Allstate and Arity, as reported in a June 9 NYT story, “Is Your Driving Being Secretly Scored?”  Allstate apparently owns Arity. Arity builds phone apps for things like finding gas stations. Their apps also track how you drive, although they bury that minor detail in their “consent” pages (that no one reads). They then share this data with Allstate.

Not a lot of gray area here. This is unethical.

My co-founder, Joel Passen, coined this mantra at our first startup 20’ish years ago:

“Build what you’d want to use, sell it how you’d want to be sold, and service it how you’d want to be serviced.”

I don’t think anyone downloading a Gas Station finder app wants their driving to be sent to Allstate. I would not. And I would not build it.

So, instead of an “Ethical AI” policy, I’ve decided we need an “Ethical Software Policy”. It will encompass our use of AI, our platform, and how we expect our software to be used.

Here’s a bit of a summary so far…

Sturdy’s Ethical Software Policy (WIP):

  • Our product is only be used to improve how businesses make decisions so they can be better vendors to their customers;
  • We will not support use cases that do not directly relate to our problem set. The use cases for our product will be obvious;
  • We do not have ulterior motives for our customer’s data or their users;
  • We will not let any entity, business, government, or person use our product in a way that violates a person’s privacy;
  • We will not, nor will we allow our product to score or rank human beings;
  • Our product will be engineered to prevent deception and must never be used to deceive people;
  • Finally, If we feel that one of our customers is using our product in a way that violates our principles, we will terminate their service.

The problem is that many “Ethical Policies” are only as good as the paper they are written on. They are a checkbox on an RFP. None of us want to live in this world. Maybe it's time to try and live in a better one.

At some point, somewhere along the corporate food chain, executives need to say, “No.”

It is hard to say “no” to revenue. Do the hard things.

Let me know your thoughts.

Steve

Similar articles

View all
Software

Have you heard this from your CEO?

Joel Passen
April 29, 2025
5 min read

"How are we using AI internally?"

The drumbeat is real. Boards are leaning in. Investors are leaning in. Yet, too many leaders hardly use it. Most CS teams? Still making excuses.

🤦🏼 "We’re not ready."Translation: We don't know where to start, so I'm waiting to run into someone who has done something with it.

🤦🏼 "We need cleaner data."Translation: We’re still hoping bad inputs from fractured processes will magically produce good outputs. Everyone's data is a sh*tshow. Trust me. 🤹🏼♂️ "We're playing with it."Translation: We have that one person messing with ChatGPT - experimenting.

😕 "Just don't have the resources right now."Translation: We're too overwhelmed manually building reports, wrangling renewals, and answering tickets forwarded by the support teams.

🫃🏼 "We've got too many tools."Translation: We’re overwhelmed by the tools we bought that created a bunch of silos and forced us into constant app-switching.

🤓 "Our IT team won't let us use AI."Translation: We’ve outsourced innovation to a risk-averse inbox.

It's time to put some cowboy under that hat 🤠 . No one’s asking you to rebuild the data warehouse or perform some sacred data ritual. You don’t need a PhD in AI.

You can start small.

Nearly every AI vendor has a way for you to try their wares without hiring a team of talking heads to perform unworldly 🧙🏼 acts of digital transformation.

Where to start.

✔️ Pick a use case that will give you a revenue boost or reveal something you didn't know about your customers.

✔️ Choose something that directs valuable work to the valuable people you've hired.

✔️ Pick something with outcomes that other teams can use.

Pro Tip: Your CEO doesn't care about chatbots, knowledgebase articles, or things that write emails to customers.

What do you have to lose? More customers? Your seat at the table?

CX Strategy

Talent gets you started. Infrastructure gets you scale.

Joel Passen
April 29, 2025
5 min read

We obsess over hiring A-players. But even the best GTM talent will flounder if the foundation isn’t there.

I’ve seen companies overpay for “rockstars” who quit in 6 months—not because they weren’t capable, but because they were dropped into chaos. No ICP. Bad data. No process. No enablement. No system to measure or coach.

Great GTM teams aren’t built on purple squirrels. They’re built on a strong foundation.

That foundation looks like this:

✅ A crisp, written ICP and buyer persona (not just tribal knowledge)

✅ Accurate prospect data to target the right ICP

✅ A playbook that outlines how you win—and how you lose

✅ A clear point-of-view that your team can rally around in every email, call, and deck

✅ Defined stages, handoffs, and accountability across marketing, sales, CS

✅ A baseline reporting system to see what’s working—and what’s not

When this exists, you can onboard faster, coach better, and scale smarter. It's not easy, and it’s not sexy, but it works.

Want to cut CAC and increase ramp speed? Start with your infrastructure. Hire into a structure.

Software

The Three Biggest Problems Facing B2B SaaS in 2025

Joel Passen
April 29, 2025
5 min read

Most B2B SaaS companies still operate like it's 2020. Everything changed: customer expectations, growth efficiency, and competitive dynamics have flipped.

Here’s what’s changed:

Net-New Growth is Slowing: Recent benchmarks show it’s not just a feeling—it's a trend. The 2024 SaaS Capital Performance Metrics Benchmark report notes a pivot from "growth at any cost" to "lower growth at reduced efficiency," with CAC Ratios, Payback Periods, and Net Revenue Retention all trending in the wrong direction. The biggest slowdowns? Private SaaS companies in the $10-$20M ARR range, where growth rates dropped sharply from 2022 to 2023.

Real-Time Expectations: Today’s customers don’t wait for a QBR. They expect immediate action when things go wrong—or when their needs change. When ignored, they escalate quickly. If your team is still relying on survey responses or notes from a quarterly meeting, you’ve already lost.

Lower Switching Costs/More Competition: SaaS is saturated. Data portability, budget flexibility, and competitive pricing mean your customers can and will leave. Loyalty isn't dead—it just has to be earned every day.

The old playbooks are outdated. In the past, churn was a problem you could try to fix before renewal. Now? It’s a daily risk.

📌 The solution isn’t more headcount (flesh) or more software (abstraction layers). It’s visibility and intelligence/insights. Business need knowledge that uncovers what customers are actually saying—across every channel/silo—and turns it into action before the renewal is at risk.

The playbook is changing fast. AI is raising the bar by transforming how teams detect realtime revenue threats, identify cross-sell opportunities, and respond to customer signals/behaviors beyond just login/usage data, opinions, and surveys. The delta between AI-powered companies and everyone else is widening very fast.

SaaS teams that win in 2025 will focus on minding GRR and stop reacting to churn—and start preventing it.

How many customers will you have to lose before you try Sturdy?

Schedule Demo
A blue and gray logo with a black background
A number of different types of labels on a white backgroundA white background with a red line and a white background with a red line andA sign that says executive change and contact request
A white background with a red line and a blue lineA number of different types of logos on a white backgroundA pie chart with the percentage of customer confusion and unhappy
A number of graphs on a white background